Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	13.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '20 at 04:54
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6320 15 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 78.1 1-Core 37.6 2-Core 97.6 46% 71.1 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 291 29% 236 Pts	64-Core 287 18% 287 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 52 45 57 62 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Read 347 Write 80.7 Mixed 103 SusWrite 59 32% 147 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 48 4K Mixed 19.2 84% 29.8 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 91.1 DQ Mixed 51 74% 143 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 150GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 87 59 54 60 57 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 372 Write 152 Mixed 151 SusWrite 86.7 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 21.5 90% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 49.9 81% 161 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 85%
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140 20,154 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 368GB free Firmware: 3202 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	9.72% Terrible	Read 27.5 Write 25.7 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 25 6% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 6.6 23% 6.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 9.72% Great: 98%
WD WD82PURZ-85TEUY0 8TB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 7.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 65 66 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	65.8% Good	Read 162 Write 156 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 65.3 88% 119 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 1.7 345% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 139%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 65 66 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.2% Average	Read 74.2 Write 63.2 Mixed 38.8 SusWrite 65.3 44% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.8 161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 82 85 84 86 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	60.4% Good	Read 128 Write 122 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 82.6 73% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 60.4% Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 914GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 82 82 86 84 86 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Read 118 Write 113 Mixed 67.7 SusWrite 82.6 70% 95.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 76%
H/W RAID10 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0957 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 133 131 129 133 136 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Read 163 Write 104 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 131 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 226% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-113.A00LF 4x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.6% Below average	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 15.1 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 10.3 22% 7.77 GB/s	Latency 84.1 48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16