Asus PRIME Z390-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 187%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics190% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z390-A  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.5 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 15:23
Run Duration299 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$262
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
99% 181 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 1128
99% 844 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$700
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
190% Outstanding
Lighting 276
Reflection 248
Parallax 282
224% 269 fps
MRender 318
Gravity 230
Splatting 169
188% 239 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 190%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
321GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,804
Write 8,784
Mixed 9,180
2,066% 9,256 MB/s
4K Read 701
4K Write 302
4K Mixed 409
1,747% 471 MB/s
DQ Read 2,195
DQ Write 1,609
DQ Mixed 1,710
1,330% 1,838 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 485 485 485 484 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 482
Mixed 389
SusWrite 485
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 33.5
4K Write 92.1
4K Mixed 46.5
159% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 352
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 115%
Great: 122%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
802GB free
Firmware: SS0411BB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1778 1118 1054 1049 1050 1047 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 2,002
Mixed 178
SusWrite 1,183
326% 1,475 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 81.3
274% 97.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,374
DQ Write 1,355
DQ Mixed 595
659% 1,108 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 319%
Great: 370%
WD My Passport 25E2 2TB
930GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 85 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 84.1
Write 83.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 83.8
102% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 53%
WD Elements 25A3 14TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 129 135 136 134 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.3% Very good
Read 134
Write 142
Mixed 173
SusWrite 133
202% 145 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.5
350% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 103%
StoreJet Transcend 8TB
2TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 183 184 181 184 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 141
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 184
189% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.9
408% 4.23 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 1.1
417% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3466 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
114% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 34.4
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 31.5
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 57.3
70% 57.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 114%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z390-A Builds (Compare 26,630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z390-A - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,082
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback