TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dimotion-xxxlutz XXXLutz

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDimotion-xxxlutz XXXLutz  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120509
Uptime11 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 11:18
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 103
2-Core 204
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 382
52% 387 Pts
64-Core 392
24% 392 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 77.5%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
Sapphire(174B E258)
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.1
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 26
Parallax 31.7
20% 27.5 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 24.7
Splatting 24.1
20% 24.2 fps
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 20.1%
 Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,308
Write 10.4
Mixed 9.7
793% 1,109 MB/s
4K Read 431
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.2
18,115% 144 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 85.6
74% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NF-CG CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.9% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 51.9%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical XXXLutz Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Dimotion-xxxlutz XXXLutz

CPU
Core i7-2600KIntel  $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples4x
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples3x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples3x
GPU
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples6x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples2x
GTX 660Nvidia  $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples1x
SSD
MZYLN128HCGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 65%, 33 samples6x
PM810 2.5" 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 41%, 2,811 samples2x
Flare 60GBPatriotBench 60%, 647 samples2x
RAM
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 12GBKingstonBench 32%, 39 samples4x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F V01L3LF4GB26826816 8GBUnknownBench 57%, 3 samples2x
KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 8GBKingstonBench 42%, 629 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback