HP EliteBook 850 G2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G2  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2216
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateMay 06 '17 at 23:37
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 250
34% 250 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
HP(103C 2216) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.55% Terrible
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 7.16
4% 6.87 fps
MRender 9.05
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 12.1
8% 8.78 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.55%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt109x- Volume 960GB
750GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2143 5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
Read 479
Write 231
Mixed 253
70% 321 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 8.17
52% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 14
DQ Mixed 8.61
10% 16.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown-1G6A1 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 18.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G2 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback