HP Z240 Tower Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z240 Tower Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 802F
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 16:36
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$180
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 172
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 590
54% 453 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 802F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4811
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.79% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 7.3
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.83 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 9
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
368GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 813 619 626 620 617 622 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,635
Write 1,132
Mixed 774
SusWrite 653
233% 1,048 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 64.8
215% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,016
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 916
693% 931 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 214%
Great: 259%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
214GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 400 407 401 364 368 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 445
Mixed 406
SusWrite 388
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 48.8
153% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 295
236% 332 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 125%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB
2GB free, PID 0300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 5.2 5.7 5.9 5.4 5.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Read 28.8
Write 3
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 5.5
10% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 7%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB
72GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 41 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 41.5
Write 41.2
Mixed 41.5
SusWrite 41.6
57% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 17.8
4K Mixed 15.9
1,194% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 15.1
DQ Write 21.3
DQ Mixed 17.4
1,372% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 71%
JetFlash Transcend 128GB
76GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 31 22 29 42 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 40
Write 13.2
Mixed 31.7
SusWrite 30.2
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 3.2
127% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Mx 16GB
1GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 104
Write 25.3
Mixed 14.7
44% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FJ Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH - [0x9B85] CT16G4DFD824A.C16FJ Hynix HMA82GU6AFR8N-UH 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
67.3% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 21.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 19.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z240 Tower Workstation Builds (Compare 3,210 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z240 Tower Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback