Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200728
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 29 '20 at 16:28
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 121
2-Core 244
79% 146 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 981
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 1336
83% 1336 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 4028 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 168
Parallax 184
139% 174 fps
MRender 216
Gravity 148
Splatting 130
130% 165 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 129%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
802GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 824 827 829 827 831 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,590
Write 1743
Mixed 1,334
SusWrite 919
314% 1,397 MB/s
4K Read 49.6
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 68.2
228% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 937
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 856
616% 801 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 225%
Great: 276%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
401GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 477 481 487 450 292 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 482
Mixed 459
SusWrite 429
106% 469 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 54
180% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 365
275% 368 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 119%
Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
785GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 125 125 126 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 161
Write 126
Mixed 96.9
SusWrite 125
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
931GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 101 100 103 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 91.8
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 102
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 76%
Kindle Internal Storage 3GB
3GB free, PID 0004
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 3.4 1.7 3.1 2.5 4.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
7.81% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 10.9
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 3.2
14% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1.1
96% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.81%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 CMK8GX4M2A2400C16 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 36.3
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 31.4
96% 33.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 29.1
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING Builds (Compare 3,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B350-F GAMING - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $470
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback