Asus P8H67-M

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H67-M (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130912
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '20 at 13:40
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	86%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2100-$49 63,701 User benchmarks, average bench 51% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 29.4 2-Core 69.9 39% 57.2 Pts	4-Core 147 8-Core 157 20% 152 Pts	64-Core 152 9% 152 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% PNY(196E 0719) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 5.1 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 2.6 4% 3.87 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 0.9 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 86 123 106 121 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 314 Write 12.5 Mixed 227 SusWrite 126 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 0.5 61% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 21.2 DQ Write 85.7 DQ Mixed 1.1 16% 36 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 86%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 450GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 78 78 77 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 84.6 Write 76.8 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 76.6 54% 73.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-001.A01LF 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 9905471-001.A01LF 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.7% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 14.7 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 10.4 SC Mixed 6.8 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 96.5 42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H67-M Builds (Compare 399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M

CPU
Core i7-2600Intel $172Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	51x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	46x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	42x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	30x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	24x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	5x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	5x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16