Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 179%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics230% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-A/USB 3.1  (all builds)
Memory90.1 GB free of 96 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 28 '20 at 20:43
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 85.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
85% 154 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 737
75% 605 Pts
64-Core 1,006
62% 1,006 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
230% Outstanding
Lighting 349
Reflection 310
Parallax 345
284% 334 fps
MRender 369
Gravity 276
Splatting 192
219% 279 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 230%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 442
Write 396
Mixed 276
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 44.2
150% 53.4 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 167
176% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
635GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1987 2020 1271 1145 1144 1146 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 2,324
Write 2,109
Mixed 1,314
SusWrite 1,452
403% 1,800 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 155
4K Mixed 79.9
265% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 806
DQ Write 657
DQ Mixed 736
550% 733 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 297%
Great: 372%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
23GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 449
Write 430
Mixed 360
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 45.1
160% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 352
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
37GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 61 61 60 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 58.4
Write 52.2
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 61
39% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
36GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 92 83 79 84 90 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 92.4
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 86.4
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
21GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 154 157 154 154 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 125
Write 134
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 154
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FAR 96GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
113% Outstanding
MC Read 44.1
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 42.9
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 23.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 106%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $357
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback