Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Memory 74.9 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 89 45% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 87.8 8-Core 77.8 11% 82.8 Pts	64-Core 87 5% 87 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 48%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xraydisk 120GB 120GB 452 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 62 17 77 6.7 50 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.4% Below average	Read 194 Write 171 Mixed 170 SusWrite 50 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 14.1 58% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 22.6 DQ Write 72.2 DQ Mixed 21.1 24% 38.6 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 78%
USB DISK 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 29GB free, PID 3234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	0.36% Terrible	Read 0.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 1 SusWrite 1.1 1% 0.92 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.36% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.7% Poor	MC Read 11.2 MC Write 6 MC Mixed 9.7 26% 8.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 7.8 19% 6.7 GB/s	Latency 90.6 44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
Sata III 128GBIntensoBench 67%, 2,059 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $338

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16