Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E500  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2991-A1
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '20 at 20:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$73
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 172
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 223
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11B9) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.1
1% 1.17 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.8
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 244 250 251 250 249 MB/s
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.7% Very good
Read 258
Write 243
Mixed 233
SusWrite 248
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 56.2
4K Mixed 35.5
120% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 155
128% 184 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
173GB free
Firmware: 17.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 105 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 105
Write 102
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 105
70% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 M378B5773DH0-CH9 Transcend JM1333KLN-2G 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E500 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback