Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20140403
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '20 at 17:41
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T-$240 23,506 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 52.5 2-Core 106 54% 83.1 Pts	4-Core 209 8-Core 265 30% 237 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Zotac(19DA 1366) CLim: 1589 MHz, MLim: 1848 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Lighting 63.1 Reflection 75.5 Parallax 65.5 51% 68 fps	MRender 68.5 Gravity 64.9 Splatting 60.1 52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$75 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 399 Write 359 Mixed 295 78% 351 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 39.1 135% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 182 156% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39 77,177 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 37GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 345 331 360 343 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	88% Excellent	Read 386 Write 347 Mixed 333 SusWrite 296 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 73 4K Mixed 43.2 138% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 260 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 222 174% 240 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 123%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G F3-12800CL9-4GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 16GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.1% Below average	MC Read 15.5 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 13.5 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 66.7 60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 756 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	381x
FX-8320AMD $75Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	83x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	30x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	27x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16