MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '20 at 13:08
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 88.7
1-Core 149
2-Core 275
94% 171 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 949
90% 748 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 110
Parallax 68.4
57% 83 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 71.2
Splatting 67.5
56% 68.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B48) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.14% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 9.2
6% 9.13 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 12.3
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.14%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$36
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 306 304 301 296 295 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 319
Mixed 303
SusWrite 301
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 43.3
173% 65.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 245
210% 311 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
189GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 489 489 486 402 277 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 488
Mixed 464
SusWrite 438
107% 476 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 61.8
212% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 209 212 211 204 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 192
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 205
116% 160 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 22.2
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback