MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B48
MotherboardMSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 88.6
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 931
92% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,228
76% 1,228 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Lighting 73.5
Reflection 76.4
Parallax 66.8
60% 72.2 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 73.6
60% 72.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 60%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
MSI(1462 7B48) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.15% Terrible
Lighting 8.43
Reflection 12.2
Parallax 9
7% 9.86 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 7.67
Splatting 16.9
11% 12.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.15%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 315 313 311 316 314 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 485
Mixed 455
SusWrite 321
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 65.6
223% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 353
266% 357 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 126%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
194GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 487 490 483 478 409 288 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 486
Mixed 462
SusWrite 439
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.7
212% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 206 199 209 205 208 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 141
Write 183
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 205
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 029E CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 029E CMK16GX4M2Z2400C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.7% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22.1
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 27.9
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) Builds (Compare 16,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z370-A PRO (MS-7B48) - $249

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $669
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback