Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 04 '17 at 11:37
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 140
60% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 389
38% 310 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 305.27
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Lighting 6.53
Reflection 8.12
Parallax 5.59
5% 6.75 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 36.1
Splatting 9.04
13% 16.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msft Virtual Disk 61GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 23.3
Mixed 25.2
20% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.74
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.77
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
1GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.39% Terrible
Read 27.6
Write 13.2
Mixed 13.9
21% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.68
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.57
49% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.9% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,066 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback