Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 13:05
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 94.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 285
97% 176 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 916
88% 724 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 172
Reflection 184
Parallax 178
140% 178 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 179
Splatting 128
119% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 511 499 474 464 450 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 1,919
Write 1,456
Mixed 572
SusWrite 509
246% 1,114 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 61.7
230% 87.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,210
DQ Write 967
DQ Mixed 966
756% 1,048 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 227%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
199GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 474 474 471 474 474 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 461
Mixed 387
SusWrite 462
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 62.8
208% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
502GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 90 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 86.1
Write 96.2
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 90.7
61% 82.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
611GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 164 165 168 168 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 166
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 188 196 193 196 195 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 158
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 192
106% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 107%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 161 164 167 166 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 151
Mixed 94
SusWrite 165
106% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
779GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 107 107 106 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 92.8
Write 95.5
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 106
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 28.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 37.5
SC Mixed 27.8
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,308 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $940
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback