Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive237% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 02:20
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 141
2-Core 280
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 898
87% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,146
71% 1,146 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 160
Parallax 161
116% 155 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 150
Splatting 112
100% 124 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 109%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 763 650 639 530 430 430 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
237% Outstanding
Read 2,088
Write 1,677
Mixed 640
SusWrite 574
276% 1,245 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 64.8
236% 89.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,121
DQ Write 937
DQ Mixed 826
674% 961 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 237%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
147GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 387 411 488 489 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 488
Mixed 399
SusWrite 447
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 46.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 62
206% 71.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
504GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 91 90 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 92
Write 89.7
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 90.4
59% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
611GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 164 164 163 153 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 153
Write 150
Mixed 104
SusWrite 161
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 101%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 227 233 226 206 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 217
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 220
133% 183 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 131%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 163 165 162 151 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 158
Mixed 111
SusWrite 160
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.2%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
779GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 106 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 105
Write 94.3
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 104
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 27.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 59.2
68% 59.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $940
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback