Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190329
Uptime7.4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 02:30
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 281
95% 172 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 876
88% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,102
68% 1,102 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 160
Parallax 158
116% 154 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 151
Splatting 110
100% 123 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 108%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 799 648 636 623 620 522 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,789
Write 1,472
Mixed 646
SusWrite 641
253% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 41.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 62.8
212% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 826
694% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 226%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
147GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 433 412 383 381 392 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 419
Write 383
Mixed 334
SusWrite 399
86% 384 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 47.6
169% 59.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 361
272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
504GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 92 91 90 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 88.3
Write 71
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 90.7
57% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
611GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 155 149 149 147 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 124
Mixed 91
SusWrite 150
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
205% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 101%
Toshiba HDWR180 8TB
7TB free
Firmware: 0603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 236 227 215 213 216 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 244
Write 204
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 221
132% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 133%
Great: 130%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
420GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 163 164 157 159 158 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 154
Write 91.2
Mixed 94.8
SusWrite 161
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
779GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 107 105 103 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 106
Write 84.7
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 105
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x16GB-$74
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 26.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 35.3
SC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
Latency 59.3
67% 59.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $940
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback