MSI MS-16R1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star GF63 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16R1  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 24 '20 at 10:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 190
80% 135 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 389
43% 340 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Max-Q Design
MSI(1462 123C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.5730
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.5% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 36.8
26% 25.2 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 35.9
Splatting 25.9
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HAJQ-00000 256GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT2300Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 109 105 102 97 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 487
Write 377
Mixed 306
SusWrite 108
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 28.9
117% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 186
156% 230 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R1 Builds (Compare 1,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback