Asus G11CD-K

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Asus G11CD-K (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G11CD-K
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161125
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '20 at 20:32
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	21%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 105 2-Core 205 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 410 53% 401 Pts	64-Core 400 25% 400 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	70.6% Very good	Lighting 85.2 Reflection 98.2 Parallax 84.8 69% 89.4 fps	MRender 90.7 Gravity 83.5 Splatting 91.8 73% 88.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GB 6,868 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 73GB free Firmware: M0MA020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 364 419 260 152 148 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 419 Write 354 Mixed 358 SusWrite 277 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 89.6 4K Mixed 35.3 129% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 307 222% 284 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 94%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 876GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA8K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 104 133 132 128 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	62.8% Good	Read 94.5 Write 128 Mixed 39 SusWrite 124 70% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 2x4GB 5,828 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 21.4 73% 25.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 18.6 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G11CD-K Builds (Compare 1,761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus G11CD-K

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	925x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	740x
Core i7-7700KIntel $248Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	30x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	459x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	300x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	242x

SSD
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBBench 78%, 6,868 samples	146x
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GBBench 63%, 4,377 samples	141x
SD8SBAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 58%, 3,654 samples	116x

RAM
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 39%, 21,551 samples	174x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples	163x
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 22,600 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $171

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16