BCM BC67Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive55.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBCM BC67Q  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '20 at 13:47
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 337
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1569 MHz, MLim: 1938 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
67.6% Good
Lighting 84.5
Reflection 92.2
Parallax 80.4
69% 85.7 fps
MRender 88.8
Gravity 79
Splatting 73.9
65% 80.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 95 59 54 55 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 452
Write 355
Mixed 108
SusWrite 80.8
55% 249 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 19.5
82% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 110
99% 156 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 82%
SSK 128GB
23GB free
Firmware: 1507
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 26.6
Mixed 29
SusWrite 27.1
22% 29 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 7.8
1,336% 7.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/4G 859B CT25664BA160B.C16F 859B CT51264BA1339J.M8F 859B CT25664BA160B.C16F 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.1
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical BC67Q Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: BCM BC67Q

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback