Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V11.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V11.1
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '20 at 09:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User KAZ-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 187
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 432
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.6% Very good
Lighting 88.3
Reflection 103
Parallax 78.3
72% 89.8 fps
MRender 85
Gravity 74
Splatting 88.3
68% 82.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 208 265 108 97 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 861
Write 560
Mixed 602
SusWrite 202
124% 556 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 47.2
168% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 42
97% 200 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 111%
Great: 157%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
833GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 131 130 131 130 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 73
Write 118
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 129
70% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
190% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 71%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 10
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 12.6
14% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.7
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.3
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V11.1 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V11.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback