Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics163% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING  (all builds)
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '20 at 05:23
Run Duration707 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 538
8-Core 931
89% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,424
88% 1,424 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Nvidia(10DE 12A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
163% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 231
Parallax 252
186% 237 fps
MRender 260
Gravity 224
Splatting 147
165% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 163%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 508
Write 475
Mixed 442
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 76.1
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 356
266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Kingston SUV300S37A240G 240GB
15GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 6.3 88 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 513
Write 165
Mixed 246
SusWrite 26.4
52% 238 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 36.3
113% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 179
146% 215 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 92%
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$116
65GB free
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 908 909 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 2,299
Write 828
Mixed 755
SusWrite 303
228% 1,046 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 47
162% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 481
DQ Write 393
DQ Mixed 576
393% 483 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 180%
Great: 355%
Sabrent Rocket Q 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: RKT30Q.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,151
Write 2,239
Mixed 1290
352% 1,560 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 68
216% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,024
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 652
500% 697 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 368%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56
25GB free
Firmware: AX0P3D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 81 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 78.4
Write 77.3
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 27.3
39% 53 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 62%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$87
46GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 83 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Read 71.8
Write 72.6
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 28.1
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 21.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 21.2
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING Builds (Compare 4,160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-H GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $936
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback