Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '20 at 16:50
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.4% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 129
57% 92.8 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 324
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
Asus(1043 0555) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.11.1
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.2% Very good
Lighting 89.6
Reflection 88
Parallax 167
73% 115 fps
MRender 85.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 124
91% 109 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
753GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 400 105 68 69 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 468
Write 430
Mixed 385
SusWrite 176
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 36.8
123% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 136
131% 208 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 121%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
29GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 100 100 103 109 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
63.1% Good
Read 117
Write 133
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 103
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 72%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
54GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 81 54 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 77.6
Write 79
Mixed 51.2
SusWrite 76.8
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 62%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
83GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 83 83 82 83 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45% Average
Read 78.2
Write 60.5
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 78.6
44% 61.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45%
Great: 72%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB
66GB free, PID 2351
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.4% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 37.3
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 38.3
50% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.8
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 274 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $687
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback