Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	92% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 129 2-Core 258 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 740 78% 623 Pts	64-Core 728 45% 728 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XFX(1682 C570) CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 64.2 Parallax 77.3 51% 68 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 60.7 Splatting 53.1 48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 49%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 204GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKK1B3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 425 415 411 411 391 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 327 Write 268 Mixed 326 SusWrite 412 75% 333 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 36.1 136% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 165 155% 236 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 859B CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 16GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	MC Read 35.6 MC Write 35.2 MC Mixed 25.3 92% 32 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.6 75% 26.3 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	172x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	70x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	64x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	26x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	25x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x

RAM
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 45%, 1,309 samples	50x
M2S4G64CB8HG5N-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 26%, 640 samples	25x
CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x8GBCrucialBench 36%, 3,530 samples	24x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $98