Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '20 at 16:12
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370-$175
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 133
59% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 408
40% 325 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 33.8
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 31.7
28% 30.5 fps
MRender 37.3
Gravity 33.9
Splatting 33.1
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
518GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 35 12 46 25 8.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 435
Write 156
Mixed 192
SusWrite 34.6
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 12.6
47% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 71.6
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 28.9
35% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 177 186 185 187 188 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 38.7
Write 110
Mixed 69.9
SusWrite 184
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK01 500GB
272GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 77 67 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 75.9
Write 80.3
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 78.5
93% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 47%
External USB3.0 DISK03 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 1.6 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.5 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 186
Write 119
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 1
112% 97.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK02 1TB
467GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 3.9 1 1.1 1.1 2.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 90.2
Write 90.1
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 2.3
77% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
122% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK04 2TB
470GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 1.5 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 166
Write 168
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 1.2
104% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
110% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK00 500GB
465GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 66 82 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 192
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 79.7
158% 134 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 16.2
4K Mixed 15.9
1,137% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 30.4
DQ Mixed 19.1
1,736% 21.2 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 13.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 48%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,844 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback