Lenovo 80E3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80E3  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5B2
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '20 at 19:21
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-6410 APU R5 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 68.9
36% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 126
17% 127 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
Legend(17AA 381A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.34% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 4.69
Parallax 3.78
2% 3.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.34%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 424
Write 298
Mixed 11.1
53% 244 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 3.1
43% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB
933, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.3% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 7.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E3 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback