Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 74.5 1-Core 74.2 2-Core 127 56% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 179 8-Core 178 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 180 11% 180 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0502) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	2.07% Terrible	Lighting 2.27 Reflection 3.38 Parallax 1.5 2% 2.38 fps	MRender 3.24 Gravity 1.23 Splatting 4.22 2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.07% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$61 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF500000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 20 167 121 153 156 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Read 409 Write 332 Mixed 282 SusWrite 141 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 12.8 4K Write 23.9 4K Mixed 12.5 48% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 113 DQ Write 85.5 DQ Mixed 44.4 48% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 55%
Generic- Multi-Card 1GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0138 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 3.3 3.5 3.6 3.5 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	2.49% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 3.5 5% 4.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.49% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB 15,815 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	48.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.8 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 14.2 40% 14.1 GB/s	Latency 91.4 44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	254x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	174x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	58x

RAM
SH564128FH8NZPHSCG 1x4GBSmartBench 25%, 800 samples	30x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	13x
KX830D-HYC 1x4GBUnknownBench 26%, 239 samples	11x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $253