ECS H67H2-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardECS H67H2-M3  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '17 at 09:48
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 92.3
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 158
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 303
40% 302 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 375.57
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.43
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 3.81
4% 4.63 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 3.43
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
475GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 94.1
Mixed 31.2
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 0.86
4K Mixed 0.26
64% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKH200UD12808-1333 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67H2-M3 Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H67H2-M3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback