Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	361% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	35.7 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '20 at 03:53
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Memory 94.6 1-Core 159 2-Core 266 98% 173 Pts	4-Core 629 8-Core 1,126 106% 877 Pts	64-Core 1,750 108% 1,750 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	7.38% Terrible	Lighting 6.9 Reflection 12.7 Parallax 9.22 6% 9.6 fps	MRender 13.2 Gravity 7.73 Splatting 17.1 11% 12.7 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.38% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$320 38,669 User benchmarks, average bench 327% 753GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2369 2221 2014 2008 2107 2113 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	361% Outstanding	Read 2,540 Write 2,410 Mixed 1,378 SusWrite 2,139 475% 2,117 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 75.2 253% 90.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,220 DQ Write 1,027 DQ Mixed 1,139 849% 1,129 MB/s
Poor: 215% ↑ This bench: 361% Great: 425%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$153 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 289 Write 113 Mixed 111 126% 171 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 1 345% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 87%
Generic MassStorageClass 8GB 303 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	7.78% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 14 Mixed 16 SusWrite 14.4 22% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.5 35% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.78% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 3x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 3 of 4 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	MC Read 37.8 MC Write 39 MC Mixed 31.9 104% 36.2 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 45.4 SC Mixed 31.8 95% 33.3 GB/s	Latency 58.2 69% 58.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 152%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 151%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	868x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	571x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	493x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	289x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	286x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $128Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	255x

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $1,312

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16