Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 17:50
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 72.8
1-Core 123
2-Core 246
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 937
85% 713 Pts
64-Core 1,337
83% 1,337 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$288
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 116
Parallax 108
100% 115 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 99.5
Splatting 81.5
83% 105 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 145 139 145 145 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 383
Mixed 396
SusWrite 163
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 51.7
169% 57 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 66.8
113% 218 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 110%
HP S600 120GB
106GB free
Firmware: HC0719C1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 147 257 58 60 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 392
Write 170
Mixed 146
SusWrite 123
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 62.8
4K Mixed 24.1
108% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 88.4
DQ Write 77.1
DQ Mixed 35.6
40% 67 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
70GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 67 68 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 66
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 68
45% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
812GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 103 110 108 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 108
Write 111
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 107
117% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GIS F4-2400C15-8GTZRX F4-2400C15-8GIS F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 27.8
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 29.9
SC Mixed 24.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 95.1
42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback