Gigabyte B450 AORUS M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS M  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime18.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 17:46
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
74% 133 Pts
4-Core 429
8-Core 788
73% 609 Pts
64-Core 1,178
73% 1,178 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.74
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 112
Parallax 108
99% 114 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 98.8
Splatting 81.9
83% 104 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D120G 120GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 147 143 145 145 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 383
Mixed 391
SusWrite 160
80% 361 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 48.1
161% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 122
139% 237 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 110%
HP S600 120GB
106GB free
Firmware: HC0719C1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 106 191 106 48 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 383
Write 384
Mixed 145
SusWrite 111
57% 256 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 22.8
104% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 88.1
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 35.3
43% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
70GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 67 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 68.3
Write 62.8
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 67.5
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB
812GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 106 108 108 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 105
Write 109
Mixed 29
SusWrite 107
116% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C15-8GIS F4-2400C15-8GTZRX F4-2400C15-8GIS F4-2400C15-8GTZRX 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 27.7
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 24.6
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 AORUS M Builds (Compare 8,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS M - $149

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback