Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 180 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 358 48% 358 Pts	64-Core 349 22% 349 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.9 Reflection 17.1 Parallax 19.8 19% 19.9 fps	MRender 25.3 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 16.7 17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 128GB-$70 10,510 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: N111 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 418 Write 149 Mixed 181 54% 249 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 67.7 4K Mixed 33.3 116% 41.9 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 32.2 70% 145 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB 26,179 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 154GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 71 74 73 74 73 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Read 77.8 Write 78.3 Mixed 49.5 SusWrite 72 51% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR1810EC58E8F1333 Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG RMR1810EC58E8F1333 Nanya NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 8GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	50.7% Above average	MC Read 17.4 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 16.1 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	1x
Mobility Radeon HD 5470ATIBench 1%, 14,621 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	1x

RAM
HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 HMT325U6BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 12GBHynixBench 34%, 1 sample	1x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	1x

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $172