MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory22 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 13:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 774
72% 597 Pts
64-Core 4,174
258% 4,174 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4044) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 236
Parallax 323
152% 249 fps
MRender 327
Gravity 247
Splatting 147
186% 240 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 151%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 38 117 137 39 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 450
Write 377
Mixed 300
SusWrite 93.9
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 12.5
52% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 50.4
DQ Mixed 26.9
33% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$148
94GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2436
Write 2,255
Mixed 1,620
468% 2,104 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 68.4
226% 77 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 791
DQ Mixed 831
637% 868 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 37.6
MC Mixed 33.5
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 25.8
SC Write 40
SC Mixed 31.4
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 102%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,619
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback