MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 202%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B92
MotherboardMSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '20 at 05:02
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2990WX-$790
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 855
76% 642 Pts
64-Core 4,272
264% 4,272 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4044) ≥ 4GB; GV-N3090VISION OC 24G
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 251
Parallax 338
162% 263 fps
MRender 326
Gravity 247
Splatting 148
186% 240 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 157%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 54 4.4 110 48 52 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 458
Write 370
Mixed 278
SusWrite 92.3
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 18.4
66% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 42.7
DQ Mixed 43.6
41% 65.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 55%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$138
127GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,492
Write 2,309
Mixed 1,741
485% 2,181 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 71.8
239% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 910
682% 909 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 34.7
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 28.5
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 32.6
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 109%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $1,606
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback