Google Zako

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Zako  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Zako
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '20 at 07:11
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4600U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 65.4
2-Core 110
52% 82.9 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 172
21% 163 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Device(1AE0 C000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.9% Terrible
Lighting 3.17
Reflection 4.19
Parallax 4.28
3% 3.88 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 1.73
Splatting 5.04
4% 4.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.9%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ThinPC 256GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 410 404 415 415 416 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 400
Mixed 380
SusWrite 411
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 97.2
4K Mixed 25.5
121% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 39.7
92% 186 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 91%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
137GB free, PID 0210
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 62 75 75 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 65.9
105% 81.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown (0) None 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.3
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 17.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Zako Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Google Zako

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback