Asrock 990FX Extreme3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 990FX Extreme3  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150804
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '17 at 18:18
Run Duration383 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 101
51% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 342
32% 268 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Zotac(19DA 2375) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.66
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Lighting 46.1
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 37.2
38% 42 fps
MRender 35.9
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 34.6
30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
825GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 147
Write 121
Mixed 86.9
88% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.26
102% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
478GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 78.8
Write 157
Mixed 20.1
62% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.19
68% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 111%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
156GB free
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 78.2
Write 62.4
Mixed 26.9
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.35
78% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 70%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29
112GB free
Firmware: VT100-50 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 56.3
Write 58.2
Mixed 56.3
43% 56.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.36
81% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 38%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
311GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
24.4% Poor
Read 63
Write 59.5
Mixed 44.5
70% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.27
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.14
31% 0.38 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 24.4%
Great: 39%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
54GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 35.2
Write 6.11
Mixed 10.4
17% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.13
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
30% 2.71 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 11.5
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FX Extreme3 Builds (Compare 302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme3 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $782
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback