PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 68% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 78.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7B92 |
Motherboard | MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds) |
Memory | 121.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190325 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 30 '20 at 16:26 |
Run Duration | 439 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
73.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
68%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 90 89 93 91 91 MB/s
|
78.7%
Very good
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB
628GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2559 2549 2554 2556 2551 2549 MB/s
|
305%
Outstanding
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB
512GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2590 2542 2545 2542 2145 1605 MB/s
|
315%
Outstanding
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 7 1TB
324GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2604 2612 2612 2609 2606 2607 MB/s
|
306%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
217GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 385 384 384 384 384 MB/s
|
96.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
222GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 384 383 383 383 383 MB/s
|
96.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB
606GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 97 92 93 MB/s
|
75.8%
Very good
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 75 75 72 70 MB/s
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Amd-raid Array 3 16TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 88 90 87 92 MB/s
|
121%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
|
139%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples | 32x |
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples | 31x |
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples | 20x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples | 11x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 10x |
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $1,611 |