MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Micro-Star MS-7B92
Motherboard	MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) (all builds)
Memory	122 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190325
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 13:07
Run Duration	269 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 2950X-$1,075 10,169 User benchmarks, average bench 81% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Memory 63.5 1-Core 131 2-Core 259 80% 151 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 989 88% 746 Pts	64-Core 2,570 159% 2,570 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.92 Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.8% Very good	Lighting 99.1 Reflection 110 Parallax 94.5 81% 101 fps	MRender 93.3 Gravity 94 Splatting 97 78% 94.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB 414 User benchmarks, average bench 205% 333GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 470 Write 462 Mixed 426 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 40.5 147% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 169 148% 213 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 375%
Amd-raid Array 5 1TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 265% 675GB free Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,698 Write 2,480 Mixed 1,418 419% 1,865 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 94.3 4K Mixed 61.6 203% 68.3 MB/s	DQ Read 556 DQ Write 676 DQ Mixed 553 434% 595 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 318%
Amd-raid Array 6 1TB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 628GB free Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,718 Write 2,444 Mixed 1,384 415% 1,848 MB/s	4K Read 48 4K Write 93.7 4K Mixed 58.2 197% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 512 DQ Write 608 DQ Mixed 586 435% 569 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 328%
Amd-raid Array 7 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 279% 792GB free Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 1,667 Write 2,591 Mixed 1269 414% 1,842 MB/s	4K Read 41.8 4K Write 97.4 4K Mixed 57.4 188% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 530 DQ Write 567 DQ Mixed 640 456% 579 MB/s
Poor: 156% Great: 311%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 216GB free Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 442 Write 428 Mixed 384 93% 418 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 43.4 139% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 281 214% 289 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 222GB free Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 443 Write 420 Mixed 384 93% 416 MB/s	4K Read 34.5 4K Write 60.4 4K Mixed 43.2 140% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 280 215% 291 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB 192 User benchmarks, average bench 166% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 429 Write 341 Mixed 429 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 23.8 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 38.6 146% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 173 146% 206 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 422%
Amd-raid Array 4 4TB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2TB free Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 98.8 Write 144 Mixed 132 95% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 1.6 299% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 190%
Amd-raid Array 3 16TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 9TB free Firmware: 9.2 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 256 Write 320 Mixed 168 184% 248 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 2.2 658% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 230%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 8x16GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 135% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	127% Outstanding	MC Read 51.4 MC Write 51.8 MC Mixed 47.9 144% 50.4 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 21.5 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 145%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92) Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 156%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X399 CREATION (MS-7B92)

CPU
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	32x
Ryzen TR 2990WXAMD $790Bench 79%, 3,658 samples	31x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	20x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	11x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	10x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	8x

RAM
CMW32GX4M4C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 29,525 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	3x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 135%, 67 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,611

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16