Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardFoxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120913
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 18:11
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 155
66% 109 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 175
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Device(105B 0DCC) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.22
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 3.33
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.17
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 131 104 107 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 162
Write 197
Mixed 184
SusWrite 119
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 42.4
4K Mixed 29.5
98% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 34.2
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 42.4
37% 52.9 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 85%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 1TB
402GB free
Firmware: 0302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32.8
Write 23.2
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 18.8
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
18GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 16 16 16 16 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.07% Terrible
Read 29
Write 24.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 15.6
23% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
27% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.07%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ST25664BA1339.8FMD Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 859B ST25664BA1339.8FMD Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.2% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.5
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 10.2
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback