Lenovo 10FM000CUK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FM000CUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30D0
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 17:08
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 69.4
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 166
61% 107 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 334
41% 312 Pts
64-Core 244
15% 244 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 6.75
5% 7.63 fps
Gravity 5.97
Splatting 13.1
9% 9.53 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-128V2S 128GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FC72202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 145 120 116 114 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 374
Write 148
Mixed 188
SusWrite 125
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 14.1
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 23.4
74% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 150
125% 182 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 84%
Jmicron Tech 120GB
21GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 66 57 51 52 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 273
Write 303
Mixed 256
SusWrite 84.5
52% 229 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 17.3
58% 19.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 125
96% 131 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 68%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
565GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 90 84 91 91 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 83.5
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 88.4
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.3% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21.1
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 20.8
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FM000CUK Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FM000CUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback