Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	82.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$169 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	63% Good	Memory 53.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 244 74% 140 Pts	4-Core 437 8-Core 322 54% 379 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	82.3% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 107 Parallax 99.9 84% 103 fps	MRender 94.9 Gravity 96.8 Splatting 96.4 79% 96 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 90 85 82 87 86 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 424 Write 393 Mixed 368 SusWrite 118 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 49.8 166% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 373 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 350 264% 354 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 124%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 327GB free Firmware: SBFKB1C2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 182 229 187 185 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.9% Below average	Read 244 Write 98.2 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 191 34% 153 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 9.3 39% 12.4 MB/s	DQ Read 15.7 DQ Write 16.8 DQ Mixed 14.8 12% 15.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 102%
Seagate ST3320820NS 324GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 302GB free Firmware: 3.BAJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 76 76 75 75 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Read 74.5 Write 41.7 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 75 43% 58.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 3.3 13% 4.4 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 47%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 71%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 61%

Destroyer

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	249x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	189x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	140x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	314x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	257x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	133x

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $655

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16