Asrock Z68 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z68 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 12:47
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 232
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 458
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
EVGA(3842 3175) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 144
Parallax 154
101% 141 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 107
101% 128 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 101%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 167 180 129 145 153 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 202
Write 242
Mixed 212
SusWrite 160
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 21.4
76% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.4
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 36.8
37% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 100%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 997GB
438GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 107 102 109 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.3% Average
Read 278
Write 269
Mixed 157
SusWrite 104
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 24.4
75% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 35
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 49.9
44% 63.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 134%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
449GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 59 60 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 87.5
Write 92
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 59.3
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 55%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 101 106 102 109 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 112
Write 106
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 103
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 109%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
2TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 0.5
0% 0.5 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-199.A00LF 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 9905403-199.A00LF 029E CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 14.9
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z68 Extreme4 - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $628
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback