Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateApr 22 '17 at 02:08
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 279
96% 173 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 757
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 763
47% 763 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.65
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Lighting 115
Reflection 115
Parallax 101
93% 110 fps
MRender 95.7
Gravity 102
Splatting 99
81% 98.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 417
Write 110
Mixed 152
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 10.1
96% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 76.3
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 23.2
36% 68.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
659GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 166
Mixed 151
123% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.21
97% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
334GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 111
87% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.35
97% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 69%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
35GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 122
Write 105
Mixed 108
84% 111 MB/s
4K Read 1.02
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.22
102% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
25GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 119
Write 116
Mixed 121
90% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.22
68% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 14.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.3
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 52.5
76% 52.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback