Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics93.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '17 at 21:41
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
99% 179 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 815
80% 655 Pts
64-Core 815
50% 815 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.92
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 122
Parallax 106
98% 116 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 107
Splatting 103
85% 104 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AA Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 446
Write 94.2
Mixed 139
49% 226 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 13.4
91% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 30.4
42% 75.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
399GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 112
Write 112
Mixed 119
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.22
92% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
250GB free
Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 88.1
Mixed 87.8
68% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.34
92% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
52GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 103
Write 113
Mixed 109
82% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.24
73% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
50GB free
Firmware: MX6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 102
85% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.71
4K Mixed 0.21
83% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3000 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.8
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 19.3
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 51.3
78% 51.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,162 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $1,025
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback