Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 19:04
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Memory 81
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
83% 151 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 958
86% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,306
81% 1,306 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1555 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Lighting 63.4
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 50.5
52% 58.7 fps
MRender 75.5
Gravity 67.7
Splatting 57.4
54% 66.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
224GB free
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1396 1153 573 584 586 586 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,314
Write 1,832
Mixed 1,585
SusWrite 813
365% 1,636 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 81.2
272% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,025
DQ Write 880
DQ Mixed 974
724% 960 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 269%
Great: 296%
Kingston SUV500M8240G 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 003056RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 94 105 127 118 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 472
Write 412
Mixed 358
SusWrite 124
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 34
116% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 204
DQ Mixed 122
121% 194 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
224GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 105 105 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 104
66% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 24GB
3000, 3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.9
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 30.4
100% 35 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 23,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $624
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback