Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '20 at 15:47
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 62.8
2-Core 155
60% 100 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 469
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 35.8
Parallax 48.2
33% 41.3 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 35
Splatting 40.2
30% 35.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
869GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 374 387 395 391 379 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 438
Mixed 415
SusWrite 377
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 51.2
158% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 187
155% 224 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 133%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
436GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 145 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 158
Mixed 138
SusWrite 145
114% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
236% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
205GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 107 106 105 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 89.1
Write 82.5
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 106
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
27GB free
Firmware: SD15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 113
Write 44.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 0.3
40% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
196GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 103 101 99 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 84.3
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 101
66% 89.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 5TB
3TB free, PID d011
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 191 198 193 193 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 176
Write 165
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 194
199% 150 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
158% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 18.3
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 14.3
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback