MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory57.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180402
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 19:17
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 231
81% 145 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 735
66% 556 Pts
64-Core 1,285
80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 150
Parallax 140
108% 141 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 140
Splatting 112
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
551GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 393 373 401 419 371 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 457
Mixed 399
SusWrite 385
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 53.3
159% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 369
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
77GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 181 187 197 196 184 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 436
Write 190
Mixed 220
SusWrite 189
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 18.2
101% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 58.7
63% 106 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
168GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 101 107 110 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 114
Write 76.5
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 103
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
740GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 108 106 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 107
Write 87.7
Mixed 54
SusWrite 105
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 64GB
2800, 2800, 2800, 2800 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.6
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 32.6
98% 34.2 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 29.7
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback