MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 08:17
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 236
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 444
8-Core 954
81% 699 Pts
64-Core 1,340
83% 1,340 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 145
Parallax 136
111% 139 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 135
Splatting 108
97% 120 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 434 416 452 428 364 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 458
Mixed 408
SusWrite 412
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 88.2
4K Mixed 52
173% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 371
278% 371 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 115%
Great: 133%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
37GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 182 191 190 193 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 461
Write 192
Mixed 231
SusWrite 186
59% 268 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 18
98% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 57.1
62% 104 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
151GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 110 109 113 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 128
Write 86.3
Mixed 82.8
SusWrite 109
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
794GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 106 106 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 102
Mixed 55
SusWrite 105
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 64GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 33.9
MC Mixed 34.1
101% 35.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 31
SC Mixed 24.6
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $525
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback