MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 05 '20 at 08:27
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 83.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 252
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 754
78% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,301
80% 1,301 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 147
Parallax 126
114% 138 fps
MRender 116
Gravity 139
Splatting 111
99% 122 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
547GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 396 395 366 405 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 411
Mixed 357
SusWrite 382
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 53
176% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 355
271% 365 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116
37GB free
Firmware: 0309
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 176 183 195 195 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 457
Write 191
Mixed 231
SusWrite 187
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 18
100% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 56.4
62% 104 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 72%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
151GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 110 114 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 89
Write 116
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 111
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
794GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 103 107 107 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 99.7
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 105
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 CMR32GX4M2C3000C15 CMW32GX4M2C3000C15 64GB
2933, 2933, 2933, 2933 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 39.3
MC Write 34.4
MC Mixed 34.2
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 37.1
SC Mixed 31.5
89% 31.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 178%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,305 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback