Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509FJ
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateOct 27 '20 at 05:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 637
65% 526 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 78%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX230
Asus(1043 11AF) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4193
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 10.8
12% 13 fps
MRender 15.7
Gravity 13.5
Splatting 13.6
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA SX6000LNP 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2s16 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 567 577 563 183 99 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,310
Write 522
Mixed 253
SusWrite 341
133% 607 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 51
192% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 519
DQ Mixed 287
242% 343 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 149%
Great: 164%
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67
293GB free
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 416 416 361 343 330 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 394
Write 175
Mixed 292
SusWrite 384
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 36.4
120% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 285
231% 328 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3E1 04CB 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 15.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 18.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509FJ_X509FJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback